You cannot be the experience
05 Sep 2011
It is possible, therefore, to only have an experience of a quality. To experience the quality, it must be setup in a state of is versus is not. In other words one side of the quality is and the other is not. The oscillation may then occur between the “is” aspects and the “is not ” aspects of the quality chosen. We last spoke of good versus evil, but it applies equally to every conceivable quality, soft vs. hard, tall vs. short and so on.
The process of choosing a quality and oscillating about it, allows one to know the quality. At the lower oscillation frequency it may be perceived as soft versus hard and as the frequency of oscillation rises, it may become known more as the quality of texture. In that state it is neither, but has the potential to be experienced as those contrasting qualities. It is easy to get so lost in becoming acquainted with the experience itself that one thinks of one being the experience instead of being one with the experience. This is what enables us to think that we are something and then accept this illusion, failing to remember who we actually are, being the potential for experience.
In this state of being we are everything and yet we are nothing. This is the ultimate paradox and seems to be a paradox only because we are wedded to the material state. For even the material state is an experience and, therefore, an illusion also, having no reality beyond experience. The zero state is neither form nor is it formless, as form can exist only in the presence of formless and vice versa.
Consequently form as well as formless are illusions and abstract, no more and no less than good or evil. They can exist only in consciousness and be generated in experience. I realize that this is also a difficult thing to wrap yourself around, as in a material experience, and being one with the experience will inevitably create the tendency to believe you are the material experience.
Such concepts and beliefs create the idea of ghosts which have no more reality than your actual material self, both manufactured from the oscillatory state that produces all experience. This also gives birth to the idea of spirit (non-material) and material. Yet, truly as we have discussed these are oscillatory states that you experience. Can you then stretch yourself to remember who you really are? Can you remember that you are neither form nor are you formless, but only potential?

2 Responses
2011 Sep 08
A very interesting article.
This explanation gives further understanding to vibration for me. If we give off vibrational signatures based on our current level of understanding, then might we be oscillating between what is understood and what is not understood? Our truths are ever-changing based on how we interact and interpret our experiences. Truth is not stationary but flexible and we are able to oscillate between what is and what is not, in a dance of sorts, to continuously better envision What Is.
2011 Sep 18
That’s way the bestest answer so far!