Quantum Mechanics of the US and Iran Part I
26 Jan 2009
When it comes to the United States, the behavior we see being displayed by the rulers of Iran can only be considered paranoid. In this display of paranoia, we should keep in mind the important role connectivity plays in the relationship between the two countries.
With connectivity underlying all things, each side of a relationship becomes a mirror, allowing one side to see by reflecting only those events that can be generated by that same one side. In other words, the reflection shows exactly what attitudes and thinking lie within. More clearly, if one side can see jealousy in another, it must already exist within its own makeup.
It is because of this connectivity that Iranian leaders fear the culture of the United States. They realize the substance of the U.S. culture is connected to theirs and because of this connection could eventually erode their own culture and threaten its perpetuation. By seeking to eliminate the United States, Iranian leaders perceive that they are fighting for their own existence as a separate entity with a unique culture and beliefs.
We hear Iranian leaders state the perceived threat from time to time. This perception can be viewed as “separation” acting on top of connectivity. The net effect is that with Iran acting in “separation” towards the United States, the “separation” gets reflected back from the U.S.
The dynamics of such interplay become magnified as the exchanges continue. But in truth, “activity” began at the level of consciousness long before we saw it displayed physically on the world stage.
The first way activity begins at any level is in thoughts and words. This happens well before we see the manifestation in physical form. In terms of Quantum Mechanics, there are no choices of outcomes other than those already made at the level of the collective consciousness of the United States and the collective consciousness of Iran. The relationship between the two countries is straddling a Level Zero and low Level One understanding. In other words, it moves between a “me” versus “you” phase to an early “us” versus “them” phase.
This is the state of the relationship between the two countries today. Any advancement in relationship requires advancement in the understanding where each country is able to see the other as connected i.e. we are all ONE. This is commensurate with an upper Level One to a Level two understanding.

Leave a reply