There is a fundamental problem that quantum mechanics creates. Evidence that the single photon can seemingly pass through both slits Young’s double slit experiment and behave as a particle and a wave on both or either sides of the slits stretches the imagination. When it is confirmed that we find what we look for we are able to confirm entanglement between our consciousness and the smallest particles of light and by extension the smallest particles of an quantum mechanical system.

The problem it produces is that whatever answer we get to any question we ask is the one we have created through entanglement with everything else. It becomes impossible to have an objective answer to any question that we ask as we through entanglement contribute to the choice of the answer.

If we ask the question in our mind the answer “coheres” as an experience within our mental consciousness. The solution does not arise from logical data manipulation but from recognition of the whole pattern that is recognized as a solution. It becomes the individual’s unique solution to that problem.

If the problem or question is asked in an experimental fashion the outcomes are still determined by the individual asking the question. In this way a different answer is obtained by a different individual, if it is not an answer that is fundamentally bound to the choices of the collective or general consciousness as for example at the time of the big bang. There is no objective answer as subjective reduction occurs to use a quantum mechanical viewpoint.

Looking at it from the viewpoint of qwiffs or quantum mechanical wave function, the qwiff of the question of the individual researcher interacts with the qwiffs that exist out in the background on top of the quantum noise. These qwiffs are modified by the thoughts of the individuals in the collective and what they believe possible. These create unique qwiffs that then determine the choice of outcomes available as answers for the question created by the individual. Thus it is these qwiffs and their interactions that create the results.

The best example of this is to look at how when a medical topic is first studied there is a scattering of results as the qwiffs are all over the place. There are no thoughts or beliefs that create a particular skew in results. However, once things are studied and beliefs about the studies and their results begin to form, these qwiffs begin to change and the results go in a particular direction.

An example of this is the studies that investigated the benefits of aspirin in the treatment of heart disease. It became gradually more evident that use of aspirin was associated with better results. This can be explained by more and more qwiffs consistent with aspirin being effective in treating heart disease became prominent. Eventually the studies seemed to confirm this.

This is more evident when the studies from Britain are examined. These were the inverse of those in the U.S. eventually showing no benefit from the use of aspirin in treating heart disease. These followed because the qwiffs from Britain were exactly opposite. This goes to show that this treatment with or without aspirin is only and association and itself has nothing to do with the outcome of heart disease or no heart disease as that outcome has to do with the qwiffs of the individual with the heart disease.