What does it mean when both choices are equally correct or incorrect?

One of the more unique problems facing us is how to make choices, when each possibility seems to lead to failure. We can find this in the way our economy works with regards to housing. It also seems to overshadow us when it comes to our health care system.

It seems as if when acting as a collective, such as being the government, we have a choice to act in a polar mutually exclusive way. The choice we have is actually based on the way that we see the problem. In other words, we perceive a problem and the potential for a polar solution for the problem. A polar solution is one that gives us an either-or approach. It is based on the way that we perceive and experience reality.

Let us for a moment think of energy. Energy really is a polar oscillation. It is an oscillation between a positive and a negative about a zero point. It may also be ocnsidered as an oscillation between a unit value positive above a zero axis and a unit value negative below the zero axis. This oscillation is basic to the way we see energy, whether electromagnetic or for that matter sound waves. All energy can be seen as an oscillation. The choice of state to be manifest is therefore a choice between positive and negative. If we are thinking about the visible spectrum, we would be choosing between observing dark or light. This is the nature of slit experiments in light and leads to observation of the condition we call a diffraction pattern when there is a summation of peaks or troughs. If the peaks come together we see a bright spot and if the troughs come together we see a dark spot. This is basic to the way we see and experience energy and reality.

We are now in the situation where making equivalent choices about our perception of reality does not provide us with the expected concrete results. Important here is the concept that previously these choices have been mutually exclusive. We were not aware of the possibility of being in the positive and the negative at the same time. In the nature of our reality there is another apparently mututally exclusive choice. This is the choice between the particle and the wave. The choice between proton and light wave is the most familiar. In physics this has been known as wave particle duality. Looked at differently, there is a third choice. The third choice is the oscillation origin point or the average between the oscillatory choices. This is in fact the zero point. The third solution is the zero point solution.

This third solution is the choice between either and or and allows some portion of both. This is the solution in the energetic sense. In the sense of the photon/wave choice, it is the choice that allows both.  It is the choice that allows the finite and the infinite to co-exist. It is the choice that allows the individual (photon) and the collective (wave pattern) to co-exist.

If we now go back to society and look at the social issues that drive and separate us now, it is possible to have a different solution. We can see that this comes down to the question of us acting as individuals separately or as a collective. In the health care debate the individual choice leads us in the direction of the Republicans,  which in the current situation leads to unsustainabilty and collapse.  If we look at the Democrats we have unsustainability at the collective level, also a prescription for failure and collapse.

The only solution is to act from the third position. This involves combining aspects of the collective and the individual in responsibility. This is the equivalent of taking the position of the zero point and bringing apparently mutually exclusive positive and negative positions and joining them together in combination.

To state it simply, in order to achieve the zero point goal at this time, we need to have “new eyes” and new perspectives in both the Democratic and Republican parties. These new and younger politicians will have the required new perspective that will eliminate the polarity that exists between both parties. It is not possible to start from a position of polar opposites and actually achieve a middle ground. It requires the ability to see that the polar opposites are both different versions of the same. We do not have the time to allow the present “old timers” to continue on their current polarizing path. We will never achieve any of the goals for health care or economic balance until this polarization ends.