You are frequency, why you need to know

Most people have no difficulty with the idea that they are frequency. This is so for even those of us who are scientifically challenged. We are aware that at some level everything is energy. We are familiar with Einstein’s equation E=mc² which relates energy E to mass or matter m, while c is the speed of light. So, we all know energy to be frequency or vibration and are further acquainted with the notions of high or low energy. We know of high and low frequency. So, if we say that we are all frequency, no one really has a problem with the notion. This is generally acceptable. Even if we went on to say that the matter making our bodies up are molecules in vibration we would not have a problem nor would we lose too many individuals. Now, we can go progressively to the point where we say that even the smallest subatomic particle itself is a frequency. Then, the real question is, what is a frequency actually?

Well, for all intents and purposes, a frequency is an oscillation. An oscillation is a motion that occurs between two positions on either side of a central position. Thus a pendulum, as a part of a grandfather clock oscillates about a central position. In this sense sound is also an oscillation. Light itself is also an oscillation. Both light and sound move about a central neutral position. Sound involves an oscillation that creates positive and negative pressures about a zero point which is neutral, such as a drum vibrating when struck or a guitar string vibrating when plucked. Light is much more interesting as it oscillates between bright and dark. Bright is the presence and dark is the absence. The neutral or average is actually light. Most people would think that light is positive and dark is negative. Consequently light is the neutral or zero-point state, the average of the peak and the trough. It is the point around which bright and dark oscillate.

So we can characterize a vibration by saying, that it is an oscillation between that which is and that which is not and arises from a neutral state of potential which is that which is neither. We can pick any attribute to see that which is in contrast to that which is not. Vibration, therefore, allows the discrimination between what is and what is not. The lower the frequency is, the more apparent the distinction between that which is and that which is not. The higher the frequency, the more blended that which is with that which is not, allowing an approximation of the primary state of origin, that which is neither. The state of origin supports the discrimination of any attribute. This is the state we call love, for it supports all without discrimination.

Yet it is clear from this analysis, that what we are, is the neutral zero state, that which neither is nor is not. This state of who we are allows us to experience any attribute.

So we can oscillate between good and bad in experience, but actually cannot be good or bad, for we are neither. It is not actually possible for us to be anything other than the zero state in actuality, but it is possible for us to experience any state. So in essence we are one thing. Now this idea may offend some of the religious, but remember this is analysis about what really is, not about religious perception.

So it is possible to experience the state of the adversary, by resonating with that vibrational state, but it is not possible to be the adversary or even for the adversary to exist, since there would be a requirement for it to actually be something and that is not “vibrationally” possible.

So, in everyday language, it is possible to choose to experience evil or to share the experience of evil, but it is not possible to be evil as that would have to be the neutral state of origin. In this way it is possible to know the experience of good and evil. We are always the thing that is neither and it is out of this neither state that experience arises. It is a difficult concept to wrap yourself around because you have always thought that you are something, rather than the eternal possibility of everything.

> > Join our Email List here

TrackBack URI | RSS feed for comments on this post

3 Responses

  1. 1 Ramona H
    2011 Aug 24

    HI Dr. Al,
    So, do I understand this correctly? Since we are neither, then we ARE Love? If that is so, it would support some types of spirituality, and being Love is a very exciting prospect indeed.

  2. 2 Chynna
    2011 Sep 18

    What a joy to find someone else who thinks this way.

  3. 3 Renee (Kent) Miller
    2011 Nov 05

    We speak of the subjects of frequency and vibration often in our own (Verdiance.com) newsletters, but perhaps have failed to illustrate it as well as you have. Thank you for giving such clarity.


Leave a reply